1 Source Private Investigations - Northwest Indiana - 219-381-8685
RSS Become a Fan

Recent Posts

Evading, Avoiding, Interfering, Ignoring a Process Server
The launch of the PI Blogline

Categories

First subject post: Process Service
PI Blogline Launch
powered by

The PI Blogline

Evading, Avoiding, Interfering, Ignoring a Process Server

The purpose of this post is to educate people about process service or receiving papers from a process server.
 
First of all; the law: 28 U.S.C. § 3004 : US Code - Section 3004: Service of process; enforcement; notice; is the Federal Law regarding the manner of service. If you are not up to date on the manner of service under Federal Rules, please go read it!
 
Secondly; Title 18 U.S.C. § 1501, is the Federal Law which puts the teeth or power in the hands of the Process Server; which provides in relevant part:

"Assault on Process Server
Whoever knowingly and willingly obstructs, resists or opposes any officer of the United States, or other person duly authorized, in serving, or attempting to serve or execute, any legal or judicial writ or process of any court of the United States...shall, except as otherwise provided by law, be fined not more than $300 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."
 
Many states have their own law, however, Indiana, the state in which I do most of my business does not have a state law. It is important to note at this point that in the absence of a state law, the Federal Law is to be enforced. I make this point because I have experienced two primary issues with this fact. Number one being that far and wide, local police departments are completely ignorant to the law that governs process servers, and number two; if they are aware of it, they routinely ignor it and refuse to enforce it.
 
The vast majority of people I come into contact with during process service have no idea what their obligations are. Many people think that if they evade or avoid service the problem will either go away, or just be put off into the future indefinately. Simply put; by not taking the papers the individual actually makes their legal issue worse. Point of fact is that in many cases if the process server acting on behalf of the plaintiff makes reasonable effort to serve the other party at the appropriate address, service can be considered performed or the court in jurisdiction may allow an alternate means of service, ie: posting or publishing. I have had cases where contact was made with an individual, and the identity confirmed as being the intended recipient, but they refused to accept service. I have submitted affidavits after such incident which were accepted by the court. Eventually, unless the subject party is found to be deceased, one of two things always happen: 1. court orders alternate non-personal service or 2. the person is served by other unconventional means.
 
I have had instances where a legal defendant not only refused to accept service by avoidance, but telephoned me with a direct threat of physical violence if I stepped foot on his property. Specifically, he left a voice mail stating that he would "beat me to death with a baseball bat if I stepped foot onto his property again..." Upon hearing this I immediately headed out to the Saint John, Indiana Police Department. I met up with a police supervisor, played the voice mail for him, and he said well lets go over there. Myself and two police officers went to the address. To my surprise I was directed to remain at the street while the two officers went to knock on the door. The defendant answered and the police simply asked him if he wanted to accept service, to which he replied "no". The police returned to my location and told me "sorry, he doesn't want the papers, and we are advising you not to enter his property..." I then read them verse and chapter of the Federal Law, to which they replied "we don't enforce Federal Law..." Additionally, they refused to deal with the threats in the voice mail.
 
Conversely; I had another instance where a defendant refused service by claiming to be another person; his brother. On further investigation at my clients request, I determined that in my defendant in fact lived at that address, and that the brother he claimed to be did not. I did a little more investigation and discovered the defendant I was looking for was a convicted murderer, and had served six years for manslaughter relating to a bar fight, and shooting. Armed with this new information I telephoned the Bellwood, Illinois Cheif of Police and asked for his help. He told me to come to the station and his officers would assist me. So I drove up to Bellwood from Northwest Indiana, to the station. Made contact with dispatch who summoned an officer to meet me near the service address. The officer I met asked me for the service address, which I provided. Upon hearing the address he keyed his mic and said "43 to Bellwood, please roll me a couple of back-up units 215 South 25 th Street", 10-4. Shortly thereafter four units arrived including a supervisor. We huddled up and they asked me what I wanted them to do. I want to go serve this guy, I want you to keep the peace. They all kept their vehicles out of sight, two officers went up the driveway around the corner from the front door. Two officers hid behind bushes to my rear out of sight, the last officer went to cover the back door. I rang the door bell, and the defendants wife appeared in a robe. I asked for Carlos, she replied there is no Carlos here, and left the front door area. I held the door bell down and began banging on the front door. Several minutes went by and Carlos appeared, opened the door and said "I told you Carlos is my brother, and he doesn't live here, and if I never see him again it will be too soon..." I advised him that I knew he was Carlos, and showed him his prison mug shot, and drivers license. And told him I knew about his murder conviction. On hearing this he stepped out onto the front porch and said "you need to get off my property before I do something to you." I attempted to hand him the papers, but he lifted his arms and said that he would not accept the papers, and stepped towards me. Officers then appeared to the porch, the supervisor said "Hi Carlos, how many times have I arrested you, six - seven times, if you want me to arrest you again I will be happy to do so, now take the papers." But he refused, so I placed them against his chest and let them drop. He said I'm not taking these, and stepped back inside the screen door. The officers pretty much told him that they were my witnesses to the service, and we all proceeded to the street. Once huddled up again one of the officers asked me why I had called them, apparently he wasn't aware of Carlos's police record. I told him that Carlos was a convicted murderer... upon hearing that Carlos ran from his house towards me at the street, yelling "you have no right to put my business on the street..." The supervisor told me to watch my back, shoved me asside, and all five of them intercepted Carlos, thew him to the ground, and arrested him. He left the location in the back of a police car, arrested for interference with a process server, and disorderly conduct.
 
These two accounts have dramatically different outcomes.
 
I would like to hear your own opinions, comments and stories.

6 Comments to Evading, Avoiding, Interfering, Ignoring a Process Server :

Comments RSS
Jay on Monday, May 09, 2011 10:48 PM
In Tucson, Arizona and surrounding cities the Police will do a civil assist and go with you to the address you are trying to serve. They will only keep the peace and will not say anything about the serve. Basically they are there just in case the person does something stupid. I honestly find it quite irritating that the police will not enforce the law of refusing service or interfering with service. I could show them the revised statutes but they will not arrest someone and charge them with anything.... :(
Reply to comment


D Larson on Friday, January 13, 2012 10:33 PM
Under 18 U.S.C. § 1501 does "of any court of the United States" mean United States Federal Court, or does it mean any lower court as well? You could be reading this wrong. Get an interpretation of "Court of the United States" to see if this Federal Law covers your with STATE Circuit Court papers in hand. PLS let me know what you find....
Reply to comment


Tom on Saturday, January 14, 2012 11:39 AM
In reply to the question: Under 18 U.S.C. § 1501 does "of any court of the United States" mean United States Federal Court, or state court? The answer is: US Federal Court, not state court. Technically; and I mean this literally - in the per se for example the Indiana Constitution, in the absence of a corresponding state law that is covered by a federal law, the state constitutionally is required to follow it. This state like many others just choose not to. It really is a travesty, but it is the reality of our time.
Reply to comment
 
eric on Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:43 PM
your answer does not make sense. After reading your blog, I am left with the thought that your are better off saying nothing.


Tom on Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:27 PM
Eric, Your "thought" that my response makes no sense, and that I am better off saying nothing simply means that you are 1. out of touch with legal reality and/or 2. completely ignorant to the Federal Law and/or Indiana State Law. I have 13 yrs as a Paralegal, and 7 as a private investigator with in excess of 2,000 hrs in court. My response says there is no Indiana Statute governing process servers, therefore; the Federal Statute prevails as the governing instrument to follow. Look Eric, this is Law 101 stuff, if you cannot get this, maybe you need to take up a different profession. Good luck.
Reply to comment


Dan Challon on Tuesday, May 22, 2012 6:00 AM
Having been a process server in the past, I have effectively evaded service and I have also gone after bonds and had lying process servers charged with perjury and losing their liceneses. I do not believe in the brotherhood of the server, and I despise gutter service: one time a guy claimed he served me when I was in another state, which I had proof with airline ticket and hotel bill. He signed the PoS with his name and nothing more...research found that he owned a process serve conpany but six months had lapsed without renewing hus license or bond; in California, a person cannot serve more than ten papers a year without a license number and bond or else it is a crime under the Business Code, and signing PoS is perjury. I sued the guy for fraud...to keep me from going to the DA and going forward to sue, he paid me $25,000 as settlement. Here is how to effectiveluy dodge process in California: never answer the door if you know you may be served, there is no law that states you have to answer the dor if you are home, even if it is a cop and he has no warant; be careful about your physical address for voting because that is public record and how many servers/PIs find people; if you answer the door, do not let them see your face, say the guy they are looking for was the prevous tenent or house owner or whatever; say he was your roommate and left; put out mail packages on doorstep with someone elses name because servers will look; check outside for someone you don't know sitting in a car and waiting; don't keep a routne of coming and going...if they know where you work, then it may be unavoidable...if they get tired of trying to find you and lie about serving you (which many lazy servers will do knowing 90% of people will no know how to fight this) and you have solid evidence you were not home, go for getting them on perjury...I got one guy on perjury by wearing fake glasses in court; when I asked the server what I was wearing when he served me, he said blah blah and that I had glasses on...I showed the judge that my glasses were stage props with no lenses. Guy got three days for contempt, lost his license, I went after his bond, and the DA charged him for perjury. You have no legal onligation to accept service where there is no contract under admiralty law. Obstruction is a crime, and never threaten or attack a server...if they do gutter service and lie (in Calif, legislation has been introduced on the matter because it has become a big problem of servers not wanting to work hard for $40-60)then you have an obligation to address the damage to your due process rights: nail these liars, get their bond for damages, put a lien on them so they can never get another bond...lying servers get no breaks.
Reply to comment

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Website:
Comment:
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Post Comment
Website provided by  Vistaprint
Website
provided by Vistaprint